When I asked my nephew, who is over 30 years old, why is the younger generation of men going far-right while the whole family was talking together on Chuseok, I thought it would be more desirable to have a strong neoliberal tendency rather than a far-right tendency. There is controversy over neoliberalism, but it would be roughly said if it was just defined to the extent that freedom was the most important and the role of the state was reduced

First, dissatisfaction with the government’s provision of support to the elderly and the poor
So I strongly criticized the second round of consumption subsidies
In the end, the country’s debts later have to be paid back by themselves, but why do they avoid this policy

Second, the younger generation is responsible for this kind of aging, and why do we sacrifice to the older generation who have made housing prices so expensive

Third, it is argued that the world’s focus on self-competence is the core of capitalism

If the elderly are incapable and cannot make a living, it is their own problem, why is the state or society responsible

Even those who do not learn environmentally or become socially disadvantaged due to difficulties are problems that they have to solve in a capitalist society. It is a matter of individual ability, not an environmental problem

The government’s policy of supporting the weak is a misguided policy of equalizing what is called human free will, or ability

In summary, many parts, such as human ability efforts, are individual problems, so why is the state trying to come forward and solve them
In other words, the government should leave it to freedom and play a minimal role

Of course, it is necessary to impose a lot of taxes on high-income earners, but that tax is used excessively for the elderly and the weak

I don’t think that’s all, but I knew what the young boys were dissatisfied with

There is something older generations should think deeply about rather than blame them

discontent with older generations who have created an environment where they can’t afford a house
(Why is the younger generation who have one house and we don’t even go to the hospital for them paying for the hospital? We can’t even buy a house, so we’d rather have an American-style medical insurance system, etc.)

Complaints about the national pension reform plan’s health insurance premiums as it progresses with aging

I didn’t have anything to say

The health insurance is also being paid for by young people (especially now, the elderly will live longer, then medical costs will increase further, and now the elderly will not be paid for it)
The national pension fund will be paid more by young people
There are complaints about the existing generation, but the reality is that the older generation has a house, and the younger generation can’t buy a house
Why do we sacrifice to them who created this world

It’s hard for me to agree with this idea
From their point of view, it is quite understandable

So we need to think deeply about how rising house prices are frustrating for young people, while the system is deeply unhappy with the policy of sacrificing for older generations

The rise in housing prices has angered them
As a result, the rejection of a system that is against them seems to be increasingly seen as far-right

Before I tell them that I’m selfish
I think we should start with the deep reflection of the older generation

I don’t think we’ll ever be able to buy a house
Pay more health insurance premiums and national pensions for the elderly who live with a house. Is this really an equal society

What do people want to say about a more equal society

If you want to do that, lower the house price for young people
Or the elderly with more than 1 billion won in house prices pay more health insurance premiums and get a national pension. Why don’t we do this policy
I have nothing to say if I say so

The rise in housing prices has a greater social impact than expected