JAMA에 11월30일에 올라온 “Will Generative Artificial Intelligence Deliver on Its Promise in Health Care?”논문.
Analysis Opinion on whether generative artificial intelligence technology can be well fused in the medical field
—- I’ve summarized the whole thing for convenience —-
History has shown that general-purpose technology often fails to deliver the benefits promised for many years (“the productivity paradox of information technology”). Healthcare has several characteristics that make successful deployment of new technologies more difficult than other industries
The prevailing technological changes in healthcare over the past 15 years have been made with the implementation of EHR. It is also worth appreciating that healthcare attempted to implement AI decades before the release of genAI, reflecting on the challenges faced with implementing EHR. In the 1960s, 1970s, and early 1980s, several companies and academia developed AI tools designed to support (or replace) clinicians as diagnostic physicians, but they have not proven helpful, leading to a “AI winter” that has significantly slowed interest and investment in healthcare AI for decades
Healthcare presents some challenges to digital innovation that are much more challenging than those seen in other industries
First, healthcare is highly regulated due to a large debate over data ownership, and strong privacy regulations significantly restrict data sharing essential to genAI
Second, because the EHR market is highly concentrated, and a small number of companies “own” the desktops of the majority of healthcare providers, companies other than EHR specializing in genAI-related tools have significant barriers to entry
Third, with a huge number of participants in healthcare, including doctors, hospitals, health insurance, employers, pharmaceutical companies, device manufacturers, and governments, the successful implementation of genAI is much more complex than the direct consumer industry, where tools only need to improve the experience of individual consumers (paying for it through capital or advertising)
Fourth, as medical data is very messy and often depends on the underlying purpose (e.g., clinical documents, quality reporting, compliance, claims), using a single dataset as the “truth” source for AI algorithms is potentially problematic
Fifth, the medical field is by no means static, and new research continues to lead to changes in understanding and practice that should be incorporated into treatment recommendations and protocols. Therefore, AI algorithms generated based on past records are old and even dangerous
So, can GenAI overcome the productivity paradox of healthcare?
(It would be helpful to analyze the possibility by referring to the interpretation of the thesis table as ChatGPT.)
In some situations, the introduction of genAI itself can quickly generate benefits, but in most cases, it can only benefit significantly when implementation is combined with significant changes in the design of the work
We expect genAI to achieve initial victories in healthcare delivery systems by addressing areas of waste and administrative friction rather than dealing with patient-facing tasks (e.g., diagnosis and treatment recommendations), and experience gained in these areas will pave the way for broader implementation in areas that more directly impact patient outcomes and experiences
To do so, GenAI developers must effectively address concerns related to hallucinations, prejudice, safety, and affordability. Regulators must establish standards that promote trust in genAI without unduly disrupting innovation. And most importantly, healthcare leaders must come up with a viable roadmap to prioritize areas where genAI can generate the most benefits for an organization, pay close attention to the complementary innovations that are still needed, and work to mitigate known problems in genAI
Paper: “Six ways large language models are changing healthcare,” published in https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2812615 Nature Medicine.
It’s not a typical six-way interview, but rather an interview with six experts, but I think it’s a piece to think about the applications and possibilities of LLM in healthcare. Of course, there are actually more applications and possibilities…
1, Virtual nurses (Munjal Shah, co-founder and CEO of Hippocratic AI)
Added: I asked ChatGPT to draw a picture as the title of my thesis without a suitable one, so I put it in. Not too bad ^^
Paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-023-02700-1
Tesla News Recap Revenues With Tariff War President Trump announces tariff reduction agreement with IndiaPresident…
The time has come… to add Tesla to the Wedbush 'best ideas' list. Dan Ives:…
Tesla News Summary You Need to Take When You're Earning Earnings Tesla Supercharger Fire Recovered…
JAMESKAT Summarized Recent Tesla Feeds. FSD is not creating new demand in the U.S. and…
That's convincing. Why does Trump want the market to be adjusted in the short term?…
❓Why did Trump adopt not only $BTC but also other altcoins as strategic assets? Thoughts…