No matter how high you are bitten by a high point, you earn money because the next high is higher in the bull market. If the high point bite position becomes negative, the next high will return with a huge profit. In other words, when bitten in the bull market, watering gives you a bomb return. It’s a magic technique.

Watering is also invincible in horizontal security. Let’s say you endure when you are bitten by the high point of horizontal security. At best, the money comes for a while, and then you go back to the loss section. However, when you ride water, your criticism descends. When you ride water, the weight increases. Even a small percentage can yield a large profit. Watering in the horizontal section is a must-win.

Watering is also effective in a downtrend that gives a rebound. Let’s say you were bitten at the high point before the start of the downtrend. In the early stages of the downtrend, the rebound comes out well. If you hold without watering, no matter how big the rebound comes, the money won’t come. However, if you get water, you can escape from the rebound or escape from the profit.

Watering is so good. But hitting with a fullvet is the worst. To water down, you have to make a small bet in the first place. You can’t water down because the fullbet has zero extra buying capacity. It’s like starting a game with 100% water down from the beginning. The only response in Poulvet is to break down. Poulvet is the worst, and being a Poulvet through watering is the next worst. It’s not bad if you’ve watered down but still have a small proportion. It’s not bad to water down. It’s bad to have a large proportion. If the proportion is large, there is no way to respond when the loss is large.

the curse of waterboarding.

Watering is not perfect. A downtrend without a rebound. It gives a rebound at the beginning of a downtrend. Market participants have not yet decided whether the market is in a downtrend or an uptrend. However, if the downtrend is confirmed and negativity spreads in the market, a one-way drop without a rebound comes out. Watering becomes the worst number in this fall without a rebound. Let’s say you use water without a limit. Watering the limitless will quickly become a fulvet, and when it rebounds, you would have sought the main office or weak day, but it goes directly to forced liquidation without a rebound. All the profits and principal accumulated so far are instantly ash. A single failure to water down removes all property. The rise and the lateral guarantee are long. The one-way fall are short. For a long time, the brain is gaslighted by the rise. You are addicted to watering and you water down big shorts. In fact, this curse is very difficult to avoid.

What should I do then?

There are four types of markets, namely the bullish market, the lateral guarantee, the rebound downtrend and the one-way crash. Under the Weinstein Classification Act, lateral guarantee is in the first stage, the bullish market is in the second stage, the rebound downtrend is in the third stage, and the one-way crash is in the fourth stage. Watering should be used differently for different stages.

It is stupid to rule out the watering itself completely.

The responses that can be used in the sale are watering, burning, partial hand-wringing, partial hand-wringing, grass hand-wringing, and grass hand-wringing. The more weapons you can use, the better. The more you can respond to it, the more you can respond to it. If you take out the watering, there are half of the methods you can respond to in the sale. There are two responses in case of loss: watering and hand-wringing, and if you throw away one, you will only have a hand-wringing left.

The only response that Fulbet can do is to become a beggar. The higher the proportion, the smaller the number of responses. That’s why Fulbet is difficult, so there’s no reason to throw away the weapon of watering. It’s not a safe way to do it. It’s also common to become a beggar by repeating your hand-wringing. As dangerous as watering. Watering and hand-wringing should be combined and used well. There is no such thing as a safe way to trade in the first place.

If you made a small bet, you can respond by watering down. The bullish market, the lateral guarantee, and the rebound downtrend can all be dealt with. You can use your hands well in the one-way big short.

You should put a limit on watering down. But in a crash like April this year or a crash like COVID, even a small proportion of the limit can make you beggars. If you have limited funds in your gift account, only your gift account needs to be tinned. But what if you put a lot of money in your gift account and bet only a small proportion? There have been a few one-way crashes in five years that are over 10% a day. On those days, all property is deleted. So you should have a limit and you should use your hands to water down.

Now, let’s sort it out.

Although the word “weight” is used, it is by no means an easy word. It is all about buying and selling. Eighty percent of the trading volume is the process of determining the appropriate weight. You shouldn’t just use your intuition to ask, “Is it a small size?” First of all, you have to decide how many times you want to use the water. Number 2 and number 3? What’s the standard? Let’s decide the size of the water when you do so three times, assuming the worst case scenario after entering the water table. It is assumed that the water limit has fallen to the standard of the hand-wringing, and even the situation where the hand-wringing is going to go out. The big short came out. It is down about 4 percent at the time of entry. In this situation, the loss should be of an affordable size. If about 10% of the total seeds are deleted, it is the maximum number that I can afford.

What should the starting position size be if it’s 3 times watering at 13 times leverage? Simple algebra.

(x + x + 2x) = 4x (three watering scenarios)
(4x) * 13 * 0.04 = 2.08x This is the loss.

This loss shall be 10% (0.1) of the total seed.

2.08 x = 0.1 * a
x = 0.048 * a

The calculation is done. The first entry ratio (x) should be 4.8 percent of the total seed, or less than 5 percent.

10 million won for the seed means 500,000 won for the first purchase. Does it look too small? 20% of the seed will be put in if you water down twice. With 13 times of leverage, the real position is more than 2.6 times of the seed. It is by no means small.

It’s obvious why people die from watering. It’s because they’re greedy from the first entry and burn 20% of the seed. Then you can’t handle it when you’re drowning, and on the last hand line, your account is already smashed. If you take 20% + 20% + 40% water 3 times, it becomes a full bet. Isn’t it 80%? Twenty percent of the losses have already disappeared.

Don’t water down